• About
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Know Your Rights
    • All Know Your Rights
    • Immigrants' Rights
    • Protesters' Rights
    • Voting Rights
    • Stopped by Police
  • Get Involved
    • Take Action Now
    • Volunteer with Us
    • Emerging Leaders
    • Campus People Power
  • Our Work
    • Nevada News
    • Court Cases
  • Join
  • Donate
    • Donate
  • Donate
    • Donate

Court Cases

  • Share this page
      • Dismissed
      • Favorable Ruling
      • Filed
      • Lost
      • Settled
      • Victory!
      • People Impacted by Discrimination
      • Voting Rights
      • Economic Justice
      • Education Equity
      • Smart Justice
      • Health Equity
      • First Amendment
Filter by Status: Victory!
    • Dismissed
    • Favorable Ruling
    • Filed
    • Lost
    • Settled
    • Victory!
    • People Impacted by Discrimination
    • Voting Rights
    • Economic Justice
    • Education Equity
    • Smart Justice
    • Health Equity
    • First Amendment

Featured Cases

Court Case
Oct 05, 2022
Graphic with a red and purple overlay featuring the exterior of the Nye County Development Services building. On the left side is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, separated by a vertical white line, the text reads “ACLU of Nevada v. Nye County” in a bold, serif font.
  • Voting Rights

ACLU of Nevada v. Nye County

On Oct. 4, 2022, the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada filed a lawsuit against Nye County to prevent the county from moving forward with its proposed unlawful hand-counting scheme during this year’s elections. We are representing Nye County voters who risk having their freedom to vote suppressed by the county’s proposed procedures for this year’s election. The case is ACLU of Nevada v. Nye County, Case No. CV22-0503. We are asking the Fifth Judicial District court to prohibit the county from publicly announcing the selected candidates on each ballot prior to the close of polls on Election Day, from limiting the use of ADA touch screens to individuals with so-called “special needs,” from allowing election workers to ask about a voter’s disability or turn away otherwise eligible voters based on arbitrary decision making, and from using “stringent signature verifications” that violate state law.

All Cases

9 Court Cases
Court Case
May 26, 2025
Graphic with a green overlay showing students raising graduation caps in celebration. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, separated by a vertical white line, the text reads “ACLU of Nevada v. CCSD” in a bold, serif font.
  • First Amendment|
  • +2 Issues

ACLU of Nevada v Clark County School District

As Southern Nevada high school seniors headed toward graduation, many of the students were at risk of having their First Amendment rights violated under a Clark County School District policy adopted in March that added new restrictions on cap and gown decorations and banned objects and adornments that “constitute proselytizing speech.” Our civil rights attorneys say that the policy has led to individual schools creating their own guidelines, which even contradict themselves. The complaint says, for example, that Canyon Springs High School and Del Sol Academy have communicated both that all cap decorations will be banned and that students can adorn their caps with decorations that have religious or cultural significance. Las Vegas High School is going even further and requiring students to submit pictures of decorations and accessories for advanced approval.
Court Case
Aug 29, 2023
Graphic with a soft magenta overlay featuring a stethoscope and a blood pressure cuff. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Silver State Hope Fund v. Nevada Department of Health and Human Services” in a bold, serif font.
  • Health Equity

Silver State Hope Fund vs. Nevada Department of Health and Human Services

The ACLU of Nevada filed a lawsuit challenging Nevada's ban on Medicaid coverage for abortion, which discriminates against women and people who can become pregnant based on their sex in violation of the protections voters added to the Nevada Constitution. Following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade last year, Nevadans turned out to the polls to overwhelmingly adopt an Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the state constitution, ensuring equality under the law regardless of race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, and more. The lawsuit brought by Silver State Hope Fund — a Nevada nonprofit that offers financial assistance to help people pay for abortion, as well as travel, lodging, and childcare to ensure they can access care — challenges the state’s Medicaid coverage ban as a violation of Nevada’s ERA. The majority of Silver State’s clients have incomes that qualify for Medicaid. Nevada’s Medicaid program, managed by the Division of Health Care Financing and Policy, has set a mission to ensure equal access to health care by providing quality medical care for low-income individuals and families who otherwise may not be able to afford health care. Despite that mission, the program specifically denies coverage for abortion, and so the majority of Silver State Hope Fund’s clients cannot get full coverage for their reproductive health care needs. The abortion coverage ban reinforces sex-based inequalities by denying only women and those who can become pregnant the ability to make decisions about their health care options and reproductive futures. There are no similar restrictions on care typically accessed by men. The lawsuit requests that the state court order the Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy to remove the abortion coverage ban in Nevada’s Medicaid program.
Court Case
Mar 21, 2023
Graphic with a navy and gold overlay showing a close-up of a gavel and a miniature scale of justice. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Leavitt v. Nevada” in a bold, serif font.
  • Smart Justice

Leavitt v. Nevada

The ACLU of Nevada is representing seven incarcerated firefighters who were badly burned while working as wildland firefighters as part of a program in which the Nevada Division of Forestry and the Nevada Department of Corrections press incarcerated people into dangerous service on behalf of the state. The case is Leavitt v. Nevada, Case No. A-23-867730-C, and it was filed in Clark County.
Court Case
Jul 06, 2022
Graphic with a red and blue overlay showing the Nevada Supreme Court building framed by weeping trees. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, separated by a vertical white line, the text reads “Falconi v. Eighth Judicial District Court” in a bold, serif font.
  • First Amendment

Falconi v. Eighth Judicial District Court

The American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada filed a lawsuit to protect the public’s right to access family court proceedings. Nearly half of the district courts in Clark County are family courts, but a recent rule in the Eighth Judicial District Court allows for closing court proceedings to the public without cause.
Court Case
Dec 21, 2021
Graphic with a purple and red overlay featuring a judge’s gavel and hand in a courtroom setting. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Martin v. City of North Las Vegas” in a bold, serif font.
  • Voting Rights

Martin v. City of North Las Vegas

The American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Foundation seeks to restore the ability of North Las Vegas residents to elect a municipal court judge of their choosing. On Feb. 17, the city of North Las Vegas adopted Ordinance No. 3060, creating a new municipal court department and appointing a judge, Christopher Lee, to a 6-year term without any election. The ordinance directly violates the North Las Vegas City Charter, approved by the Nevada Legislature, which mandates that when the city appoints a judge to fill a vacant position in the Municipal Court, “[n]o such appointment extends beyond the first day of the month following the next general municipal election, at which election the office must be filled for the remaining unexpired term.” The next elections to be held in the City of North Las Vegas are scheduled for June and November of 2022, 4 years and two full election cycles before the appointment described in Ordinance No. 3060 ends. In its writ, the ACLU of Nevada is asking the court to require the city to hold an election for Municipal Court Department 1 during the 2022 election cycle as required by the North Las Vegas City Charter.
Court Case
Jan 06, 2021
Graphic with a bold red overlay featuring the Nevada Supreme Court building. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Williams v. Lazer” in a bold, serif font.
  • First Amendment

Williams v. Lazer

This case arises out of a defamation lawsuit filed by Mr. Lazer, a white man, against Ms. Williams, a Black woman. Mr. Lazer represented Ms. Williams in a real estate transaction and, according to Ms. Williams, made statements that were racist and sexist during the course of the sale.
Court Case
Jul 05, 2018
Graphic with a dark blue overlay showing a clipboard with a medical form, a stethoscope, and a pen. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “ACLU of Nevada v. Nevada Department of Corrections” in a bold, serif font.

ACLU of Nevada v. Nevada Department of Corrections

The ACLU of Nevada submitted a public records request on June 15th asking for various records relating to lethal injection drugs and the Department of Corrections’ execution protocol, but the Department has refused to release any information prior to this execution. The writ petition seeks to force NDOC to release these records.
Court Case
Nov 02, 2017
Graphic with a muted green overlay showing a simple balance scale. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Davis v. Nevada” in a bold, serif font.

Davis v. Nevada

Court Case
Aug 27, 2015
Graphic with a cool blue overlay featuring the Statue of Liberty against a cloudy sky. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Duncan v. Nevada” in a bold, serif font.

Duncan v. Nevada

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of a group of parents, clergy, and other taxpayers, sought to prevent the state from diverting taxpayer dollars to primarily religious private schools. There were no restrictions on how participating schools, a majority of which are religious, could use the money: Many of the schools eligible to participate in the program use thoroughly religious curricula and textbooks; many require students, parents, or employees to be of a certain faith, attend a certain church, or sign pledges of faith; many of the schools also discriminate against LGBT students or employees and those who have had an abortion; and at least one school eligible to participate in the program uses corporal punishment to discipline students. We filed suit in District Court for Clark County, Nevada, in August 2015, arguing that the voucher program violated the Nevada Constitution’s prohibition on the use of public funds for any sectarian purpose and the state constitutional guarantee of a uniform system of common schools. The district court judge granted the state’s motion to dismiss and we appealed. In September 2016, the Nevada Supreme Court struck down the voucher program, holding that the legislature’s mechanism for funding the program violated the state constitution.
Court Case
May 26, 2025
Graphic with a green overlay showing students raising graduation caps in celebration. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, separated by a vertical white line, the text reads “ACLU of Nevada v. CCSD” in a bold, serif font.
Court Case
May 26, 2025
  • First Amendment|
  • +2 Issues

ACLU of Nevada v Clark County School District

As Southern Nevada high school seniors headed toward graduation, many of the students were at risk of having their First Amendment rights violated under a Clark County School District policy adopted in March that added new restrictions on cap and gown decorations and banned objects and adornments that “constitute proselytizing speech.” Our civil rights attorneys say that the policy has led to individual schools creating their own guidelines, which even contradict themselves. The complaint says, for example, that Canyon Springs High School and Del Sol Academy have communicated both that all cap decorations will be banned and that students can adorn their caps with decorations that have religious or cultural significance. Las Vegas High School is going even further and requiring students to submit pictures of decorations and accessories for advanced approval.
Explore Case
Court Case
Aug 29, 2023
Graphic with a soft magenta overlay featuring a stethoscope and a blood pressure cuff. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Silver State Hope Fund v. Nevada Department of Health and Human Services” in a bold, serif font.
Court Case
Aug 29, 2023
  • Health Equity

Silver State Hope Fund vs. Nevada Department of Health and Human Services

The ACLU of Nevada filed a lawsuit challenging Nevada's ban on Medicaid coverage for abortion, which discriminates against women and people who can become pregnant based on their sex in violation of the protections voters added to the Nevada Constitution. Following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade last year, Nevadans turned out to the polls to overwhelmingly adopt an Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the state constitution, ensuring equality under the law regardless of race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, and more. The lawsuit brought by Silver State Hope Fund — a Nevada nonprofit that offers financial assistance to help people pay for abortion, as well as travel, lodging, and childcare to ensure they can access care — challenges the state’s Medicaid coverage ban as a violation of Nevada’s ERA. The majority of Silver State’s clients have incomes that qualify for Medicaid. Nevada’s Medicaid program, managed by the Division of Health Care Financing and Policy, has set a mission to ensure equal access to health care by providing quality medical care for low-income individuals and families who otherwise may not be able to afford health care. Despite that mission, the program specifically denies coverage for abortion, and so the majority of Silver State Hope Fund’s clients cannot get full coverage for their reproductive health care needs. The abortion coverage ban reinforces sex-based inequalities by denying only women and those who can become pregnant the ability to make decisions about their health care options and reproductive futures. There are no similar restrictions on care typically accessed by men. The lawsuit requests that the state court order the Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy to remove the abortion coverage ban in Nevada’s Medicaid program.
Explore Case
Court Case
Mar 21, 2023
Graphic with a navy and gold overlay showing a close-up of a gavel and a miniature scale of justice. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Leavitt v. Nevada” in a bold, serif font.
Court Case
Mar 21, 2023
  • Smart Justice

Leavitt v. Nevada

The ACLU of Nevada is representing seven incarcerated firefighters who were badly burned while working as wildland firefighters as part of a program in which the Nevada Division of Forestry and the Nevada Department of Corrections press incarcerated people into dangerous service on behalf of the state. The case is Leavitt v. Nevada, Case No. A-23-867730-C, and it was filed in Clark County.
Explore Case
Court Case
Jul 06, 2022
Graphic with a red and blue overlay showing the Nevada Supreme Court building framed by weeping trees. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, separated by a vertical white line, the text reads “Falconi v. Eighth Judicial District Court” in a bold, serif font.
Court Case
Jul 06, 2022
  • First Amendment

Falconi v. Eighth Judicial District Court

The American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada filed a lawsuit to protect the public’s right to access family court proceedings. Nearly half of the district courts in Clark County are family courts, but a recent rule in the Eighth Judicial District Court allows for closing court proceedings to the public without cause.
Explore Case
Court Case
Dec 21, 2021
Graphic with a purple and red overlay featuring a judge’s gavel and hand in a courtroom setting. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Martin v. City of North Las Vegas” in a bold, serif font.
Court Case
Dec 21, 2021
  • Voting Rights

Martin v. City of North Las Vegas

The American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Foundation seeks to restore the ability of North Las Vegas residents to elect a municipal court judge of their choosing. On Feb. 17, the city of North Las Vegas adopted Ordinance No. 3060, creating a new municipal court department and appointing a judge, Christopher Lee, to a 6-year term without any election. The ordinance directly violates the North Las Vegas City Charter, approved by the Nevada Legislature, which mandates that when the city appoints a judge to fill a vacant position in the Municipal Court, “[n]o such appointment extends beyond the first day of the month following the next general municipal election, at which election the office must be filled for the remaining unexpired term.” The next elections to be held in the City of North Las Vegas are scheduled for June and November of 2022, 4 years and two full election cycles before the appointment described in Ordinance No. 3060 ends. In its writ, the ACLU of Nevada is asking the court to require the city to hold an election for Municipal Court Department 1 during the 2022 election cycle as required by the North Las Vegas City Charter.
Explore Case
Court Case
Jan 06, 2021
Graphic with a bold red overlay featuring the Nevada Supreme Court building. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Williams v. Lazer” in a bold, serif font.
Court Case
Jan 06, 2021
  • First Amendment

Williams v. Lazer

This case arises out of a defamation lawsuit filed by Mr. Lazer, a white man, against Ms. Williams, a Black woman. Mr. Lazer represented Ms. Williams in a real estate transaction and, according to Ms. Williams, made statements that were racist and sexist during the course of the sale.
Explore Case
Court Case
Jul 05, 2018
Graphic with a dark blue overlay showing a clipboard with a medical form, a stethoscope, and a pen. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “ACLU of Nevada v. Nevada Department of Corrections” in a bold, serif font.
Court Case
Jul 05, 2018

ACLU of Nevada v. Nevada Department of Corrections

The ACLU of Nevada submitted a public records request on June 15th asking for various records relating to lethal injection drugs and the Department of Corrections’ execution protocol, but the Department has refused to release any information prior to this execution. The writ petition seeks to force NDOC to release these records.
Explore Case
Court Case
Nov 02, 2017
Graphic with a muted green overlay showing a simple balance scale. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Davis v. Nevada” in a bold, serif font.
Court Case
Nov 02, 2017

Davis v. Nevada

Explore Case
Court Case
Aug 27, 2015
Graphic with a cool blue overlay featuring the Statue of Liberty against a cloudy sky. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, the text reads “Duncan v. Nevada” in a bold, serif font.
Court Case
Aug 27, 2015

Duncan v. Nevada

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of a group of parents, clergy, and other taxpayers, sought to prevent the state from diverting taxpayer dollars to primarily religious private schools. There were no restrictions on how participating schools, a majority of which are religious, could use the money: Many of the schools eligible to participate in the program use thoroughly religious curricula and textbooks; many require students, parents, or employees to be of a certain faith, attend a certain church, or sign pledges of faith; many of the schools also discriminate against LGBT students or employees and those who have had an abortion; and at least one school eligible to participate in the program uses corporal punishment to discipline students. We filed suit in District Court for Clark County, Nevada, in August 2015, arguing that the voucher program violated the Nevada Constitution’s prohibition on the use of public funds for any sectarian purpose and the state constitutional guarantee of a uniform system of common schools. The district court judge granted the state’s motion to dismiss and we appealed. In September 2016, the Nevada Supreme Court struck down the voucher program, holding that the legislature’s mechanism for funding the program violated the state constitution.
Explore Case

Stay Informed

Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

  • Careers
  • Donate
  • Press Releases
  • Contact Us

© 2025 ACLU of Nevada

  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Statement
  • Website Accessibility