• About
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Know Your Rights
    • All Know Your Rights
    • Immigrants' Rights
    • Protesters' Rights
    • Voting Rights
    • Stopped by Police
  • Get Involved
    • Take Action Now
    • Volunteer with Us
    • Emerging Leaders
    • Campus People Power
  • Our Work
    • Nevada News
    • Court Cases
  • Join
  • Donate
    • Donate
  • Donate
    • Donate

Court Cases

  • Share this page
      • Dismissed
      • Favorable Ruling
      • Filed
      • Lost
      • Settled
      • Unfavorable Ruling
      • Victory!
      • Economic Justice
      • Education Equity
      • First Amendment
      • Health Equity
      • People Impacted by Discrimination
      • Smart Justice
      • Voting Rights
Filter by Status: Unfavorab...
    • Dismissed
    • Favorable Ruling
    • Filed
    • Lost
    • Settled
    • Unfavorable Ruling
    • Victory!
    • Economic Justice
    • Education Equity
    • First Amendment
    • Health Equity
    • People Impacted by Discrimination
    • Smart Justice
    • Voting Rights

All Cases

1 Court Case
Court Case
Dec 30, 2024
Graphic with a blue overlay featuring a judge’s gavel resting beside a balance scale. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, separated by a vertical white line, the text reads “Singh v. Nissan Moto Co.” in a bold, serif font.
  • People Impacted by Discrimination

Singh v. Nissan Moto Co. (Amicus)

The ACLU of Nevada filed an amicus brief urging the Nevada Supreme Court to strengthen its interpretation of the Equal Rights Amendment to prevent racial discrimination within the courts. A Batson challenge is an objection raised by a lawyer during jury selection when they believe the other side is excluding a potential juror because of their race. Under the Nevada Supreme Court decision in Dixon v. State, Batson challenges are not applicable when the excluded juror is an alternate who did not actively deliberate. Our amicus argues that the Batson process should prohibit a party from striking a juror if that party offers a race-based justification, even if that juror would have been an uncalled alternate. Ultimately, the panel of judges decided that it was a harmless error, a decision unfavorable to our amicus brief.
Court Case
Dec 30, 2024
Graphic with a blue overlay featuring a judge’s gavel resting beside a balance scale. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, separated by a vertical white line, the text reads “Singh v. Nissan Moto Co.” in a bold, serif font.
Court Case
Dec 30, 2024
  • People Impacted by Discrimination

Singh v. Nissan Moto Co. (Amicus)

The ACLU of Nevada filed an amicus brief urging the Nevada Supreme Court to strengthen its interpretation of the Equal Rights Amendment to prevent racial discrimination within the courts. A Batson challenge is an objection raised by a lawyer during jury selection when they believe the other side is excluding a potential juror because of their race. Under the Nevada Supreme Court decision in Dixon v. State, Batson challenges are not applicable when the excluded juror is an alternate who did not actively deliberate. Our amicus argues that the Batson process should prohibit a party from striking a juror if that party offers a race-based justification, even if that juror would have been an uncalled alternate. Ultimately, the panel of judges decided that it was a harmless error, a decision unfavorable to our amicus brief.
Explore Case

Stay Informed

Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

  • Careers
  • Donate
  • Press Releases
  • Contact Us

© 2025 ACLU of Nevada

  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Statement
  • Website Accessibility