Spokesperson

A man with a neatly trimmed beard and short hair, wearing a black turtleneck and a black blazer, stands against a plain white background.

Athar Haseebullah

Executive Director

he/him/his

Woman with long straight brown hair, wearing a black top, smiling in front of a white background.

Sadmira Ramic

Senior Staff Attorney

she/her/hers

Media Contact

Communications Department, [email protected]

LAS VEGAS – The American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada has supplemented its petition challenging the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD)’s 287(g) agreement. The supplement comes as a result of LVMPD unlawfully transferring its client to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody without notice, just days after a lawsuit was filed on his behalf, and raises additional questions about LVMPD’s authority to ignore orders issued by Nevada district courts.

The organization’s client, Sergio Morais-Hechavarria, has since been moved to Texas under a federal immigration hold. ACLU of Nevada says the transfer not only violated his rights, but also undermines the authority of Nevada’s judicial system, exposing a dangerous breakdown in the separation of powers between state and federal government.

The lawsuit, filed last week, challenges LVMPD’s 287(g) agreement with ICE—a contract that deputizes local officers to perform federal immigration enforcement duties without authorization from the Nevada Legislature. The ACLU of Nevada argues that LVMPD’s cooperation with ICE in this case directly obstructed a state court order and violated Nevada’s constitutional framework by allowing a federal administrative detainer to override judicial authority.

ACLU of Nevada executive director Athar Haseebullah said:

“LVMPD releasing Mr. Morais-Hechavarria into ICE custody immediately after we filed a legal challenge to their unlawful cooperation with ICE is egregious. If a local government agency like LVMPD is permitted to arbitrarily enter into agreements with the federal government with no state legislative authorization to do so and to thereafter disregard a lawfully issued Nevada court order at its own discretion, we face a major separation of powers issue with both our state legislature and state judiciary lacking coequal power. Our challenge to LVMPD’s reckless and unlawful agreement with ICE is moving forward, and we remain confident in our arguments as we fight to preserve the integrity of Nevada’s judicial system, the Nevada legislature, and the civil liberties we hold dearly. We aren’t in the business of bending the knee.”

Related Content

Court Case
Oct 13, 2025
Graphic with the ACLU of Nevada logo on the left and text reading ‘Morais-Hechavarria v. LVMPD’ on the right. In the background, a red and blue tinted photo shows a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department patrol vehicle with its logo visible on the door.
  • People Impacted by Discrimination

Morais-Hechavarria v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

We filed a lawsuit challenging the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department’s (LVMPD) 287(g) agreement with ICE. That agreement allows ICE to use local law enforcement to assist in carrying out its federal immigration enforcement agenda.
Press Release
Oct 13, 2025
Placeholder image
  • People Impacted by Discrimination

ACLU of Nevada Challenges Local Law Enforcement Cooperation with ICE 

LVMPD’s 287(g) agreement violates Nevada law, obstructs Nevada court order, and drains state resources