UPDATE: On Aug. 3, the judge presiding over Davis v. Nevada has approved a stipulated consent judgment which will build upon last year’s legislative reform and ensure a true overhaul of the state’s public defense system. For a minimum of three years, a court-appointed monitor will ensure that Nevada complies with the terms of the judgment and fulfills its constitutional duty to guarantee the right to counsel for all.

View the Notice of Settlement

On June 14, 2019, Judge James Wilson granted our motion for class certification. The class now consists of all persons who are now or who will be facing formal charges in a rural county for which the penalty includes the possibility of imprisonment and who are entitled to the appointment of counsel under the Constitution. 

On November 2, 2017, the ACLU of Nevada filed a class-action lawsuit against the state of Nevada for failing to ensure rigorous legal representation to people accused of crimes who can’t afford attorneys. The American Civil Liberties Union, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, and Franny Forsman, who served as the federal public defender in Nevada for more than 20 years, are co-counsel in the suit.

The Constitution makes Nevada responsible for upholding the Sixth Amendment inside its borders. Yet the state has abdicated its constitutional responsibility, leaving Nevada’s rural counties to cobble together an unworkable system that lacks sufficient resources, standards, or oversight by the State. These rural counties use a system of de facto flat fees that give lawyers strong financial incentives to provide as little legal assistance to their clients as possible because they will receive the same amount of money regardless of the effort and time they spend on a case. These contract lawyers also take on private clients who pay them much more. As a result, contract attorneys have little incentive to investigate their public clients’ cases, they typically don’t contact their clients for months at a time, they pressure their clients into pleading guilty to charges they haven’t investigated, and they fail to advocate effectively for their clients at sentencing.


First Judicial District Court


James E. Wilson Jr.