New York Times v. 2nd Judicial District Court and Does (Amicus)

  • Filed: October 10, 2024
  • Status: Filed
  • Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
  • Latest Update: Oct 10, 2024
Graphic with a red and blue overlay featuring a close-up of a document showing the words “1st Amendment” and part of a U.S. flag in the background. A pen lies across the page. On the left is the white ACLU of Nevada logo. On the right, separated by a vertical white line, the text reads “New York Times v. 2nd Judicial District Court and Does” in a bold, serif font.

In NYT v. Second Judicial District Court, multiple national media organizations, including The New York Times, CNN, NPR, and others, challenged a Nevada district court’s decision to seal nearly all hearings and filings in a high-profile case related to Rupert Murdoch’s trust. The district court’s ruling directly contradicts the Nevada Supreme Court’s interpretation of the First Amendment right to access civil proceedings found in Falconi v. Eighth Judicial District Court.

The ACLU of Nevada, in partnership with Holland and Hart, filed an amicus brief urging the Nevada Supreme Court to reverse the lower court’s decision and affirm the public’s constitutional right to access court proceedings.


The ACLU of Nevada does not represent the parties in this case, and our involvement is limited to filing an amicus curiae brief, also known as a “friend of the court” brief, which allows us to share legal arguments, policy expertise, and broader civil liberties perspectives that may assist the court in making its decision. We file these briefs in cases that may have significant implications for constitutional rights and civil liberties, even when we are not directly representing the client or parties named in the lawsuit.

Case Number:
89347
Pro Bono Firm:
Holland and Hart